Mar 152015

JohnWilliamWaterhouse-MiranDid Atlantis sink, or did the water rise to cover it, and why does it matter?

Another thing to make you go hmm…

Atlantis is treated as a myth by most people in science for a number of reasons, but chief among them is the lack of geological evidence so far for the sinking of an island city beyond the Pillars of Hercules (which marked the sides of the Strait of Gibraltar).

But reflect upon the implications that arise when the possibility that Atlantis actually existed is viewed in light of the claim by Plato (where our first reference to Atlantis originated) that Atlantis as a Kingdom existed in a time period that happens to coincide with the last Ice Age, a period leading up to some 12,500 years ago. And further consider that he also stated that Atlantis’s destruction occurred within the period of time that was during and just after the end of that ice age?

Viewing the demise of the Atlantean Culture from the possibility of it being the result of the end of the last Ice Age causing sea levels to rise, as opposed to the subsidence of a large geological land mass beneath the surface of the ocean, seems to answer a number of questions that have been posed by material science relating to the lack of probability of the existence of Atlantis as anything other than a myth, providing a much more plausible explanation for science to consider than the subsiding of the area due to plate tectonics causing the subduction of a plate (which would have taken a very long time, and would have had to occur as far back as a few million years ago).

Some points to ponder in support of rising sea levels causing the destruction of Atlantis:

The existence of Atlantis in a time period that preceded the end of the last Ice Age would place it anywhere from 22,000 years ago when the Ice Age was at its peak and the sea levels would have been at their lowest, to 12,000 years ago when temperatures had settled out to a range that was at or near today’s climate causing the seal level to start to rise, eventually reaching the level at which it is today.  Of course the Atlantean culture could also have existed in a period that began much more than 22,0000 years ago, but it would seem that the 20,000 BCE to 10,000 BCE period is the most likely range to consider.

*   As an example of recent discoveries of structures now submerged deep in the ocean that had to have been constructed prior to the end of the last ice age, what is “thought” to be a perfectly shaped underwater pyramid that is apparently oriented by the cardinal points has been found recently by the Portuguese Hydrographic Institute of the Portuguese Navy between the islands of São Miguel and Terceira, in the Azores of Portugal. The pyramid was found in an area of the mid-Atlantic that has been underwater for about 20,000 years. (see the link section at the end of this article for more information about this discovery)

  If Atlantis existed up to the end of the last ice age, or even a bit longer, then this was a period that is recent enough that there could conceivably have still been historical records relating to Atlantis in the Library of Alexandria at the time that Plato is alleged by some to have visited there. It is my understanding that it is also thought by some that it was while studying at the Library that he was introduced to the story of Atlantis as a culture and its demise some 9,000 years before his time, roughly about 9,500 BCE (give or take a few hundred years, or 11,500 years ago).

As pointed out above, the possibility that Atlantis was inundated by rising sea levels as the result of the end of the ice age counters the claim raised by geologists that the lack of any geological evidence of a major area sinking in the Atlantic proves that Atlantis never existed.

So, in conclusion, why would contemplating the possibility that the destruction of Atlantis could have been caused by rising sea levels rather than by a continent sinking make any difference in how the legend is perceived by mainstream culture?

First of all, why do all the stories about Atlantis have it sinking rather than being inundated? I believe that the most common phrase that I have seen used to describe the final moments of the city of Atlantis is that “it sank beneath the waves”, generally interpreted to mean that it sank like a boat would. But that is not the only possible meaning of the phrase. “Sank beneath the waves” can also be used to describe what happens to a fixed object as the water level rises, as when a river floods. But a matter of semantics is not what is important here.

What is important is that while no physical proof has been found through scientific research over the last several hundred years that could be used to validate the assumed cause for the destruction of Atlantis being as the result of a continent sinking, physical proof has been found of the destruction of other cities as the result of rising sea levels.

As I said in the opening, “Atlantis is treated as a myth by science for a number of reasons, but chief among them is the lack of geological evidence so far for the sinking of an island city”. However, we do have an increasing amount of physical evidence that has been found in just the last few decades that provides multiple examples of cities and other manmade structures that are now under water in areas that have no geological evidence of ground subsidence. What that means is that these structures could not have been built more recently than since the last ice age ended; because that was the last time the area would have been above water. And if it is true for these areas, could it not also be possible that a culture that we call Atlantis existed but was, as legend claims, submerged beneath the seas, only not by continental subsidence, but by a rising sea level?

And finally, if we abandon the portion of the Myth that is based on a cause for which we have no proof, and began to work with an alternate cause for which we do have proof, then myth takes a step closer to becoming history.


Underwater Pyramid Found Near Portugal Has Portuguese Navy Investigating
“The pyramid was found in an area of the mid-Atlantic that has been underwater for about 20,000 years. Considering this is around the time of the last ice age where glaciation was melting from its peak 2000 years prior, whatever civilization, human or not, that was around before the ice age, could be responsible for building the pyramid. While the Portuguese Navy still hasn’t determined the origins, many might question why this hasn’t been first reported on sooner than late 2012.”

Underwater Pyramid Found Near Portugal

Stone circles found on Virginia property
“Concentric stone circles near rocks weighing more than a ton – apparently aligned to mark solar events – are believed to be part of a Paleo-Indian site in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Clarke County that an expert has dated to about 10,000 B.C.”

Concentric stone circles near rocks weighing more than a ton – apparently aligned to mark solar events – are believed to be part of a Paleo-Indian site in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Clarke Count

Lost city ‘could rewrite history’
“Marine scientists say archaeological remains discovered 36 metres (120 feet) underwater in the Gulf of Cambay off the western coast of India could be over 9,000 years old.”


Some older books on this subject that might be of interest:

“Atlantis: The Antediluvian World” by Ignatius Donnelly, first published in 1882.

“The Story of Atlantis and The Lost Lemuria” by W. Scott-Elliot containing two stories that were first published separately in 1896 and 1904

“Lemuria, The Lost Continent of the Pacific” by W.S. Cervé with a chapter by Dr. James D. Ward first published in 1931.

“Atlantis, Mother of Empires” by Robert B. Stacy-Judd, first published in 1939
(This is like the copy that I have, but there are cheaper versions out there)

And a more recent book:

“Atlantis, The Eighth Continent” by Charles Berlitz published in 1984

Dec 082014

An article in the April 2013 issue of: Paranthropology: Journal of Anthropological Approaches to the Paranormal

Review/Commentary: Rupert Sheldrake’s ‘Science Set Free’ – John R. DeLorez (pp. 19-22)

I tried to order this book under the title The Science Delusion from several times last year, but it was sold out each time. When it became available last October here in the US under the title Science Set Free I got my copy right away. It is an excellent summary of how science can be too selective as to what it is willing to accept as data worthy of evaluation. For all intents and purposes, this biased approach to what it considers valid data blinds science to anything that might possibly exist outside of its presently accepted materialistic framework.

The structure of Science Set Free is a little different to most books on technical subjects that I am used to (in a good way). In the introduction Sheldrake lists ten core assumptions that he has observed that most scientists take for granted as being facts. “In this book, I argue that science is being held back by centuries-old assumptions that have hardened into dogmas. The sciences would be better off without them: freer, more interesting and more fun.”

Jul 052014

014In a recent discussion about the U.S. Military Remote Viewing Handbook that is now available for public access, I brought up that what is today called Remote Viewing is a practice that I was introduced to early in my studies [1] under the name of “Mental Travel”, a specific practice within the area of Clairvoyance.

The term Remote Viewing was coined by physicists Harold E. Puthoff and Russell Targ at SRI International in 1972 to label a process whereby a person allows their awareness to expand sufficiently to be able to focus on a remote location and/or event, viewing it as if they were physically there.

The basic perception of how this is possible is that the consciousness of every individual has the ability to access information through means beyond the five physical senses. These additional “non-physical” or “extra-sensory” senses provide us with the ability to observe or sense information for which there is no apparent physical means of access. They are lumped together by modern Parapsychology under the name of Extra-Sensory Perception or E.S.P.

Now, in addition to its original reference to “seeing at a distance”, the term Remote Viewing has been expanded to encompass a range of abilities that in the past were grouped under the name Clairvoyance within the Oriental Occultism Philosophy[2] modalities of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Carlos S. Alvarado, PhD, Visiting Scholar, at the Rhine Research Center, in a recent post on his blog titled Remote Viewing and Stock Market Predictions discussed a paper authored by Christopher Carson Smith, Darrell Laham, and Garret Moddel entitled “Stock Market Prediction Using Associative Remote Viewing by Inexperienced Remote Viewers”, which explained, in part, “each participant in the study remotely viewed (emphasis mine) an image from a target set of two images, one of which he or she would be shown approximately 48 hours from that time. Of the two images in the target set, one corresponded to whether the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) would close up, while the other corresponded to whether it would close down at the end of the intervening trading day. For feedback, the viewers were shown only the picture actually associated with the actual market outcome. In aggregate, the participants described the correct images, successfully predicting the outcome of the DJIA in seven out of seven attempts (binomial probability test, p < .01). Investments in stock options were made based on these predictions, resulting in a significant financial gain.

My purpose in mentioning the preceding is not to in any way detract from the value of the work being done today in studies such as this, but to merely point out that the ability to “see” an event in the future that is now being called “Associative Remote Viewing”, and in some cases that I have seen, “Mental Time Travel”, is not a new thing, but has traditionally been studied under the classification of Clairvoyance (Clear Seeing).

I am not sure whether this re-labeling of abilities is being done in an attempt to distance this area of Parapsychology from any association with fortune telling or other “non-scientific” practices, or that today’s researchers are truly not aware of what Clairvoyance is, nor are they conversant with just how much research into this area has already been done by their predecessors in the West over the last 125 years.

Although it could be both, I am afraid that it is predominantly the latter, because much of what I read about present research doesn’t seem to be actually covering any new ground or provide for any new approaches, so what follows is a brief introduction to Clairvoyance in its many forms for any who might not be familiar with the subject of Remote Viewing under its original name.

Because of the way it is frequently used in today’s popular culture, the word Clairvoyance more often than not elicits an immediate negative reaction. But when used properly Clairvoyance can either designate one specific psychic sense: “Clear Seeing”, as in the case of the “Stock Market Prediction Using Associative Remote Viewing by Inexperienced Remote Viewers” study referenced above; or it can be used in a broad sense to encompass the entire set of psychic senses exhibited by individuals who were either born with a working awareness of these extra senses, or who have worked on developing one or more of them through study and exercise, as is the case for the Remote Viewers that the Military Manual was developed for.

The half dozen individual “psychic abilities” most often found under the heading of Clairvoyance are listed below. They are interrelated parts of what could be viewed as a parallel nonphysical nervous system, and in most cases, all are possessed on at least at some level of capability by those considered Clairvoyant.

1. Clairvoyance: “Clear Seeing”, the ability to “see” people, places and events through means other than physical sight, a “vision” using a more traditional label, or Remote Viewing and/or Mental Travel to use the more modern one

Clairvoyance may provide an image of something in the present or from the past. The latter form has been used successfully in Archeology on dig sites to “see” what the area looked like in the far past. Decisions on where to dig on the sites that were based these images have borne fruit in finds that would have otherwise been missed without using this technique. It has also been used in the viewing of maps of areas like the Sahara (and labeled as Remote Viewing by the Archeologists) to select areas for exploratory digs. There too it has produced good results.

Clairvoyance may also provide an image of the future, as in the Stock Market study cited above, but those who were traditionally experienced in this area always warned that at the moment that an image is viewed it is the “probable” future. But as time passes the probable future is subject to change, and the further out in the future that the image viewed is, the more likely the change.

Those who practice Clairvoyance also frequently experience Clairaudience with the images, in other words, pictures with sound.

2.  Clairaudience: “Clear Hearing”, the ability to hear sound that is “psychically” rather than physically generated. For example, this could be a disembodied voice or voices, or the sound of music when there is no physical source for it, or the full range of sounds that come with a Clairvoyant Vision of either a distant place (Remote Viewing), or sounds associated with the past of a physical location which the Clairvoyant person is experiencing, etc.

3.  Clairsentience: “Clear Feeling”, in the popular vernacular, an Empath. One who possesses Clairsentience is able to feel the emotions of others, and can frequently do so whether the person is in their presence or at a distance if there is some form of linkage between the individual and the Clairsentient.

Emotions can also be felt by a Clairsentient that have been imbedded either in the past or present in material objects or physical areas. Sensitives and Mediums who can sense strong emotions from the past in their surroundings fall under this classification. Some also use the term Psychometry for this ability, but I do not believe this to be accurate since in Psychometry much more than just emotions can be detected. Clairvoyance frequently also comes into play in Psychometry.

4.  Claircognizance: “Clear Knowing”, the ability to just “know” that something is true without any physical means of acquiring that knowledge. A somewhat mundane example would be to suddenly “just know” that an alternate route should be taken to avoid an area, without knowing that an accident has occurred on the road ahead. Premonitions are one form of Claircognizance.

The last two kinds of Clairvoyance that follow generally go unmentioned by name in early reference works on the subject. They were forms of information that were just accepted as being so much a common part of our ability to interpret nonphysical energies in physical symbolisms such as a scent, as to not really require singling out. A classic example would be that smell of flowers than most of us have occasionally experienced when there were no flowers present. Although more recent reference works do provide them with names, they are still rarely mentioned.

5.  Clairalience: “Clear Smelling”, also sometimes labeled Clairescence or Clairolfactance, it is the ability to sense non-physical information in the form of a scent or smell.

6.  Clairgustance: “Clear Tasting”, similar to Clairalience in that non-physical information is sensed in the form of a taste. Since the physical senses of taste and smell are so closely related, these two psychic senses are also frequently experienced together.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

[1]Beginner’s Exercise That Was My Introduction to Mental Travel

As was mentioned in the opening, I was introduced to the practice of Mental Travel early in my studies. As part of that introduction there was a beginner’s exercise provided for learning Mental Travel/Remote Viewing. For those who are willing to put in the effort, a summary of that exercise is given below. It starts with learning to do Mental Travel or Remote Viewing within the boundaries of your home, and since this is an exercise that will generally require repeated practice initially, it is recommended that you choose a room for this exercise that you can make use of frequently, and where you won’t be disturbed.

  • Because it is your home and you are there all the time, most of what is in the room has long since been relegated to just background information, so the first step is to walk around the room really looking at everything in it, taking note of as much detail as possible.
  • Next, if there is not already a chair in the room near the middle, place one there and sit down.
  • This exercise works best if you are already accomplished in reaching a light meditative state at will. With your eyes closed, relax and center yourself, than begin creating a three dimensional image in your mind of the room around you. Make it as detailed as possible.
  • Once you have this image fixed, see the room in your mind from the perspective of you standing up. Then continue the visualization of what the room looks like in your mind as you move to a location somewhere in the room behind you.
  • Once there, examine in detail an object or book as if you were physically there. For example, in the case of a book see yourself opening it and read what is written on the page that you opened it to.
  • Then, again in your mind, return to the chair and view the room as it is in front of you.
  • Open your eyes and compare what you physically see to what you saw in your mind.
  • You will want to repeat this exercise as often as necessary for it to become fairly easy for you. Once you have reached that point you can begin to test yourself. In the case of the book visualization, when you have finished the exercise actually get up and go to the book and look up the page that you visualized, and see if it matches what you saw in your mind.
  • When you find that you can satisfactorily reproduce your surrounding room in your mind and travel to any part of it with reasonable accuracy, the next step in the exercise is a straightforward one. While sitting in your chair, in your mind simply go to the door and walk out of it. The door in this step is your gateway to whatever destination you have decided to go visit, and you can find yourself in your room one second, and upon going through the door, in the next second find yourself at your destination.

Bon Voyage

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

[2] Oriental Occultism as a field of study comes from the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society. In the early Theosophical Society there was both an Exoteric Section (formalized in 1875) and an Esoteric Section (formalized in October 1888). From the beginning there was significant resistance on the part of the bulk of the membership towards the activities of the Esoteric Section, and by the 1930’s or perhaps even earlier, the Esoteric Section just seems to disappear from public view. As a result of the reduction in published works from the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society after this time, modern publications on subjects such as Clairvoyance (Remote Viewing) provide very little information on the methodology needed for acquiring these skills.

While many people are at least familiar with the Theosophical Society by name, I find that most in general seem to have very little awareness of how large a role this society has played in the numerous Western Spirituality Movements that have sprung up over the last 125 years or so. Names like H. P. Blavatsky, Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, and W.Q. Judge are always mentioned in articles about the founding of the Theosophical Society and are credited for heavily influencing the growth in interest in Eastern Philosophies that followed the founding of the Society, but many other names that show up in discussions about the Spirituality Movements that came into being in the 20th Century are also people that either played a prominent leadership role in the Theosophical organization throughout their lives, or were active in the Society for a period of time prior to breaking off to form their own organizations. This list includes names of people such as; Annie Besant, Katherine Tingley, Rudolf Steiner, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Alice Bailey, C.W. Leadbeater, A.P. Sinnett, T. Subba Row, G. de Purucker, Jinarajadasa, Manly P. Hall, The Ballards (who formed the “I Am” movement), Rudolf Steiner (who was expelled from the Society by Annie Besant, along with the entire German Section of the Society and all of its branches because of Steiner’s development of Anthroposophy), and Max Heindel (who formed the Rosicrucian Society in Oceanside California).

A number of prominent organizations (in addition to those already mentioned) were initially formed by Theosophists, such as the London Society for Psychical Research (S.P.R.) founded in part by F.W.H. Meyers, W. Stanton Moses and C.C. Massey, prominent Theosophists of the late 19th Century, and in San Jose, California, The Rosicrucian Brotherhood (AMORC).

A sampling of names of prominent people who credited Theosophy with either providing them with their world view, or for having had a profound influence on their lives include Elizabeth Clare Prophet, Thomas Edison, L. Frank Baum (Wizard of Oz), Paul Gauguin, William Butler Yeats, Henry Ford, Mohandas Gandhi (who in his autobiography claimed that the members of his Indian National Congress “were all Theosophists”),Elvis Presley(!), Jane Goodall, and rumor has it, Albert Einstein, just to name a few.

An excellent timeline covering the growth of the Theosophical Society, including all of the in-fighting, splintering off into new groups, and internal politics that keep reshaping the society into something that I doubt Blavatsky would recognize, can be found in the book; The Theosophical Movement, 1875 ~ 1950, put out by The Cunningham Press, Los Angeles, CA in 1951, if you can find a copy through one of the Antiquarian Book Sellers.